<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE IMPORTANCE OF REPLICATION IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE [1/2]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailyskeptic.org/getpsyched/2013/09/29/replication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailyskeptic.org/getpsyched/2013/09/29/replication/</link>
	<description>a science-based perspective on contemporary psychology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mignone</title>
		<link>http://dailyskeptic.org/getpsyched/2013/09/29/replication/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mignone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 13:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailyskeptic.org/getpsyched/?p=217#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. Apparently prevalent in the pharmaceutical industry, genetics and neurology. Makel mentions Ioannis, he has studied this extensively. Increased frequency of replication studies would help, but there is still a pervasive expectation to achieve significance. I am not sure to what extent it&#039;s an extension of experimenter bias or pressure from publishers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Apparently prevalent in the pharmaceutical industry, genetics and neurology. Makel mentions Ioannis, he has studied this extensively. Increased frequency of replication studies would help, but there is still a pervasive expectation to achieve significance. I am not sure to what extent it&#8217;s an extension of experimenter bias or pressure from publishers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
